[2601.23045] The Hot Mess of AI: How Does Misalignment Scale With Model Intelligence and Task Complexity?
Abstract:As AI becomes more capable, we entrust it with more general and consequential tasks. The risks from failure grow more severe with increasing task scope. It is therefore important to understand how extremely capable AI models will fail: Will they fail by systematically pursuing goals we do not intend? Or will they fail by being a hot mess, and taking nonsensical actions that do not further any goal? We operationalize this question using a bias-variance decomposition of the errors made by AI models: An AI's \emph{error-incoherence} on a task is measured over test-time randomness as the fraction of its error that stems from variance rather than bias in task outcome. Across all tasks and frontier models we measure, the longer models spend reasoning and taking actions, \emph{the more incoherent} their failures become. Error-incoherence changes with model scale in a way that is experiment dependent. However, in several settings, larger, more capable models are more incoherent than smaller models. Consequently, scale alone seems unlikely to eliminate error-incoherence. Instead, as more capable AIs pursue harder tasks, requiring more sequential action and thought, our results predict failures to be accompanied by more incoherent behavior. This suggests a future where AIs sometimes cause industrial accidents (due to unpredictable misbehavior), but are less likely to exhibit consistent pursuit of a misaligned goal. This increases the relative importance of alignment research targeting reward hacking or goal misspecification.
[2601.23045] The Hot Mess of AI: How Does Misalignment Scale With Model Intelligence and Task Complexity? Skip to main content arXiv is now an independent nonprofit! Learn more × Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search --> Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2601.23045 (cs) [Submitted on 30 Jan 2026 ( v1 ), last revised 10 Apr 2026 (this version, v2)] Title: The Hot Mess of AI: How Does Misalignment Scale With Model Intelligence and Task Complexity? Authors: Alexander Hägele , Aryo Pradipta Gema , Henry Sleight , Ethan Perez , Jascha Sohl-Dickstein View a
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- The Hot Mess of AI: How Does Misalignment Scale with Model Intelligence and Task Complexity?alignment.anthropic.com
- The hot mess theory of AI misalignment: More intelligent agents behave less coherently | Jascha’s blogsohl-dickstein.github.io
- Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to me — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Alignment remains a hard, unsolved problem — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Anthropic’s “Hot Mess” paper overstates its case (and the blog post is worse) — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to meblog.redwoodresearch.org
- AGI Ruin: A List of Lethalities — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Recommendations for Technical AI Safety Research Directionsalignment.anthropic.com
- My picture of the present in AI — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Off Target | CNAScnas.org
- Alignment remains a hard, unsolved problem — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to me — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org