✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
We Don’t Need a New Twitter | The New Yorker
newyorker.com · 1,626 words · saved by 1 readers
It’s time to move beyond the flawed idea of a global conversation platform.
Save this story Save this story In early July, Meta introduced Threads , a text-posting social-media application that was clearly designed to steal market share from Twitter, which continues to struggle under the leadership of Elon Musk . Adam Mosseri, the executive in charge of Threads, recently explained that the goal of the service is “to create a public square for communities on Instagram that never really embraced Twitter and for communities on Twitter (and other platforms) that are interested in a less angry place for conversations.” Chris Cox, Meta’s chief product officer, was more blun
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Remains of the Dayeugenewei.com
- Threads and the Social/Communications Map – Stratechery by Ben Thompsonstratechery.com
- What Is the Point of Threads, Zuckerberg’s ‘Twitter Killer’? - ArtReviewartreview.com
- How to Blow Up a Timeline - Remains of the Dayeugenewei.com
- why is Threads so toxic? - by Duy Le - the frog societythefrogsociety.com
- Status as a Service (StaaS) - Remains of the Dayeugenewei.com
- The lost threadrobinsloan.com
- 54 How do we reimagine Twitter? - Initiative for Digital Public Infrastructure at UMass Amherstpublicinfrastructure.org
- Ruling the Waves – In The Zeitgeiststevebarrera.com
- Back to the Future of Twitter – Stratechery by Ben Thompsonstratechery.com
- How to Twitter Successfully | near.blognear.blog
- Group chats rule the worldsriramk.com