✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
The Case for Canvas — Charlsy Yang
charlsyang.com · 970 words · saved by 1 readers
Design, writing, and thinking.
Designing with agentic coding tools is in and Figma is out—at least that’s the sentiment. After spending some time with these new tools, I do feel like they have a very different rhythm of making things. One common pattern of designing with agentic coding tools is parallelization: having multiple agents running at the same time working on different aspects of the UI. The benefit of parallelization is that I don’t have to wait for each agent to finish running, which is often the bottleneck (latency) and what breaks flow. The downside is it’s cognitively demanding to manage multiple threads of c
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- AI Design Field Guideaidesignfieldguide.com
- Using AI as a Design Engineerjakub.kr
- AI Design Field Guideaidesignfieldguide.com
- Karri Saarinen on X: "Whenever a new design to code tool comes around, people get excited. It’s considered the holy grail of design. You can now design with code. This is the final evolution. But I don’t agree. It’s only the holy grail if yx.com
- Shipping at Inference-Speed | Peter Steinbergersteipete.me
- Tools for thought: science, design, art, craftsmanship? | Andy Matuschakandymatuschak.org
- Vibe-coding limits a creator’s potentialconnieliu.work
- sam henri gold on X: "Thoughts and Feelings around Claude Design" / Xx.com
- Agentic Coding Ascension Notes – Machine Learning (Theory)hunch.net
- Why Figma Wins - kwokchainkwokchain.com
- Ryo Lu on X: "Getting to great design isn’t about narrowing your focus onto one tiny problem or building yet another “purpose‑built” tool. It’s about learning to see through the surface and recognize the truths underneath everything we do – the same patterns, the same flows, the same ideas" / Xx.com
- Dylan Field en X: "Claude Code to Figma Design" / Xx.com