Why I don't persuade people to do AI safety
A take that I hold now, somewhat strongly, is that I do not persuade people to do AI safety. I generally try not to "pill" them on AGI. That's not to say I don't talk about AI, or my work. Just that I (try to) never convince or change their mind.
Why I don't persuade people to do AI safety A take that I hold now, somewhat strongly, is that I do not persuade people to do AI safety. I generally try not to "pill" them on AGI. That's not to say I don't talk about AI, or my work. Just that I (try to) never convince or change their mind. This is weird on first blush. I believe AI will be the greatest technological revolution we see in my lifetime, and perhaps all human history. Nat would argue that holding onto this is selfish. You know a bit of information that, if you're right, could help people you care about make better career decisions
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- Changing the world for the worse — LessWronglesswrong.com
- You Need A Theory of Victory - by Jason Hausenloyfirstscattering.com
- You will be OK — LessWronglesswrong.com
- What 81,000 people want from AI \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- I'm Switching Into AI Safetyalexirpan.com
- Turning 20 in the probable pre-apocalypse — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Why AI Will Save the World | Andreessen Horowitza16z.com
- Which side of the AI safety community are you in? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Where I agree and disagree with Eliezer — LessWronglesswrong.com
- "Taking AI Risk Seriously" (thoughts by Critch) — LessWronglesswrong.com
- What mistakes has the AI safety movement made? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI: Practical Advice for the Worried — LessWronglesswrong.com