✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

How to Improve Both Scientific Innovation and Reproducibility at Once – Good Science Project

goodscienceproject.org · 4,405 words · saved by 1 readers

Science has two stark problems: replication and innovation. Many scientific findings aren’t reproducible. That is to say, you can’t be sure that another study or experiment on the same question would get similar results. At the same time, the pace of scientific innovation could be slowing down. Does attempting to solve one problem make the other worse? Many have argued that policies seeking to avoid reproducibility issues will create a constrictive atmosphere that inhibits innovation and discovery. Indeed, top policymakers are worried about just this. Along with other prominent philanthropists and academics, I attended a White House meeting on scientific reproducibility early in 2020 (just before COVID-19 really hit). One of the key questions on a sheet of paper that the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy circulated for discussion was whether a tradeoff existed: Would efforts to improve reproducibility risk harming the creativity and innovation of federally-funded rese

December 13, 2024 How to Improve Both Scientific Innovation and Reproducibility at Once This is a rerun of a piece I wrote for the journal Works in Progress four years ago ( here ). Science has two stark problems: replication and innovation. Many scientific findings aren’t reproducible. That is to say, you can’t be sure that another study or experiment on the same question would get similar results. At the same time, the pace of scientific innovation could be slowing down. Does attempting to solve one problem make the other worse? Many have argued that policies seeking to avoid reproducibility

Explore this link on the map →

related reading