✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Historical Notes on Texture Synthesis

graphics.stanford.edu · 1,052 words · saved by 1 readers

Many people have commented on the similarity between Wei&Levoy's SIGGRAPH 2000 paper [1] and Efros&Leung's ICCV 99 paper [2]. To some people it even appeared that [1] is a direct derivation of [2]. This, unfortunately, is not true. I would like to explain this by describing the historical process of how I came up with my ideas in [1]. Hopefully this can help clarify some of the confusions in terms of citations for texture synthesis. In addition, this presents an interesting history of how my original ideas came up. My texture synthesis research started as a term project in 1998 at David Heeger's class "Psych 267: Vision and Image Processing". David has a very interesting paper on texture synthesis [9], and that prompted my interest in texture synthesis. Around that time there are two additional state-of-the-art texture synthesis papers: one by Jeremy Debonet [7] and another by Eero Simoncelli [8]. My initial attempt is to use the ideas about joint relationship in [8] to improve the ima

Historical Notes on Texture Synthesis Historical Notes on Texture Synthesis Many people have commented on the similarity between Wei&Levoy's SIGGRAPH 2000 paper [1] and Efros&Leung's ICCV 99 paper [2]. To some people it even appeared that [1] is a direct derivation of [2]. This, unfortunately, is not true. I would like to explain this by describing the historical process of how I came up with my ideas in [1]. Hopefully this can help clarify some of the confusions in terms of citations for texture synthesis. In addition, this presents an interesting history of how my original ideas came up. My

Explore this link on the map →

related reading