On Nathan Schneider on the limits of cryptoeconomics
Nathan Schneider has recently released an article describing his perspectives on cryptoeconomics, and particularly on the limits of cryptoeconomic approaches to governance and what cryptoeconomics could be augmented with to improve its usefulness. This is, of course, a topic that is dear to me ([1] [2] [3] [4] [5]), so it is heartening to see someone else take the blockchain space seriously as an intellectual tradition and engage with the issues from a different and unique perspective.
Dark Mode Toggle On Nathan Schneider on the limits of cryptoeconomics 2021 Sep 26 See all posts On Nathan Schneider on the limits of cryptoeconomics Nathan Schneider has recently released an article describing his perspectives on cryptoeconomics, and particularly on the limits of cryptoeconomic approaches to governance and what cryptoeconomics could be augmented with to improve its usefulness. This is, of course, a topic that is dear to me ( [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] ), so it is heartening to see someone else take the blockchain space seriously as an intellectual tradition and engage with the issues
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Who will control crypto? — saffronsaffron.mirror.xyz
- On Collusionvitalik.eth.limo
- What I'm frustrated by in cryptoamirbolous.com
- Crypto's Three-Body Problemotherinter.net
- Why I’m cryptophobic - Bessemer Venture Partnersbvp.com
- Inês Faria on Crypto as Ritual and Religionthe-crypto-syllabus.com
- Go Fork Yourself - Not Boring by Packy McCormicknotboring.co
- Crypto Canon - a16z cryptoa16zcrypto.com
- Why are we here? | Permissionless II Keynote by Eric Voorheeswhyarewehere.xyz
- The Web3 Movement’s Quest to Build a ‘Can’t Be Evil’ Internet | WIREDwired.com
- Cryptonetwork Governance as Capital - Placeholderplaceholder.vc
- DSHR's Blog: EE380 Talkblog.dshr.org