Morality, Compassion and the Sociopath — Ribbonfarm
Again, the response to the Gervais Principle II seems to require a response to key themes that have emerged. There are several that I am going to touch upon in…
Collected in The Gervais Principle → Again, the response to the Gervais Principle II seems to require a response to key themes that have emerged. There are several that I am going to touch upon in the next part, and some I am not touching, ever, but one deserves note and a serious response, since I hadn't planned on addressing it. This is the question of good and evil. For those of you who want the elevator-pitch version, the short position is this: my entire thesis is amoral; there are good and evil sociopaths; more sociopaths is a good thing; the clueless and losers are exactly as likely to
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- The Gervais Principle VI: Children of an Absent God — Ribbonfarmribbonfarm.com
- Book Review: The Gervais Principle - by Scott Alexanderastralcodexten.com
- The Gervais Principle V: Heads I Win, Tails You Lose — Ribbonfarmribbonfarm.com
- The Gervais Principle, Or The Office According to "The Office" — Ribbonfarmribbonfarm.com
- The Gervais Principle III: The Curse of Development — Ribbonfarmribbonfarm.com
- The Gervais Principle IV: Wonderful Human Beings — Ribbonfarmribbonfarm.com
- The Gervais Principle VI: Children of an Absent God — Ribbonfarmribbonfarm.com
- The Gervais Principle, Or The Office According to "The Office" — Ribbonfarmribbonfarm.com
- Book Review: The Gervais Principle - by Scott Alexanderastralcodexten.substack.com
- Matt Yglesias Considered As The Nietzschean Supermanastralcodexten.com
- What It’s Like to Be a Sociopath - The New York Timesnytimes.com
- The Gervais Principle V: Heads I Win, Tails You Lose — Ribbonfarmribbonfarm.com