You Need A Theory of Victory - by Jason Hausenloy
substack.com · 3,329 words · saved by 1 readers
The cause of AI safety is losing. Consider asking: how can we win?
Note: The majority of this post is adapted from a talk I gave recently. These do not represent the views of my employer. Scroll around the organizations on this cute AI safety map. Think about, or ask, how does their work help with AI safety? My guess is that, maybe some won’t know, but most would say “X of our actions will lead to Y self-evidently good outcome.” Maybe, they’ll say, if we measure model capabilities well (we have the graph), policymakers will wake up and see AIs are improving quickly, and get their act together. In the best case, we could become a neutral third-party…
saved by
related reading
- You Need A Theory of Victory - by Jason Hausenloyfirstscattering.com
- AGI Ruin: A List of Lethalities — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Core views on AI safety: When, why, what, and how \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Where I agree and disagree with Eliezer — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AGI safety career advice — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Core views on AI safety: When, why, what, and how \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- I'm Switching Into AI Safetyalexirpan.com
- A Field Guide to AI Safety—Asteriskasteriskmag.com
- What failure looks like — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- AI safety - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Reframing AI Safety as a Neverending Institutional Challenge – Stephen Casperstephencasper.com
- AGI safety career advice — LessWronglesswrong.com