flâneur

The Ethics of Ambiguity by Simone de Beauvoir

marxists.org · 8,253 words · saved by 1 readers

“Life in itself is neither good nor evil. It is the place of good and evil, according to what you make it.” MONTAIGNE. “THE continuous work of our life,” says Montaigne, “is to build death.” He quotes the Latin poets: Prima, quae vitam dedit, hora corpsit. And again: Nascentes morimur. Man knows and thinks this tragic ambivalence which the animal and the plant merely undergo. A new paradox is thereby introduced into his destiny. “Rational animal,” “thinking reed,” he escapes from his natural condition without, however, freeing himself from it. He is still a part of this world of which he is a consciousness. He asserts himself as a pure internality against which no external power can take hold, and he also experiences himself as a thing crushed by the dark weight of other things. At every moment he can grasp the non-temporal truth of his existence. But between the past which no longer is and the future which is not yet, this moment when he exists is nothing. This privilege, which he alo

The Ethics of Ambiguity by Simone de Beauvoir The Ethics of Ambiguity. Simone de Beauvoir 1947 I. Ambiguity and Freedom “Life in itself is neither good nor evil. It is the place of good and evil, according to what you make it.” MONTAIGNE. “THE continuous work of our life,” says Montaigne, “is to build death.” He quotes the Latin poets: Prima, quae vitam dedit, hora corpsit. And again: Nascentes morimur. Man knows and thinks this tragic ambivalence which the animal and the plant merely undergo. A new paradox is thereby introduced into his destiny. “Rati

related reading