[D] OpenAI Rubik’s cube hype : r/MachineLearning
I am nobody but it seems that a non trivial number of papers released in RL recently don't actually provide anything. Each paper uses it's own metrics that often go by the standards set by DM/OpenAI using training hours in the order of days on thousands of machines and training steps in the order of Billions. It feels that most of the papers are tiny incremental changes and Grad Student Descent..
I am nobody but it seems that a non trivial number of papers released in RL recently don't actually provide anything. Each paper uses it's own metrics that often go by the standards set by DM/OpenAI using training hours in the order of days on thousands of machines and training steps in the order of Billions. It feels that most of the papers are tiny incremental changes and Grad Student Descent.. They are going to the opposite direction of Yoshua Bengio’s composable latents and composable disentanglement approach. Could you tell me more about this? 100% of OpenAI's contribution here is to…
related reading
- Let's Discuss OpenAI's Rubik's Cube Resultalexirpan.com
- Learning to reason with LLMs | OpenAIopenai.com
- [1910.07113] Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Handarxiv.org
- Q-learning is not yet scalableseohong.me
- Late Takes on OpenAI o1alexirpan.com
- Deep Reinforcement Learning: Pong from Pixelskarpathy.github.io
- How Claude Performs on Robotics Tasks \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Reddit - Please wait for verificationreddit.com
- Key Papers in Deep RL - Spinning Up documentationspinningup.openai.com
- o1 and Reasoning | AndoLogsblog.ando.ai
- GitHub - adam-maj/robotics: A deep dive on the history of robotics and the future of humanoidsgithub.com
- Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face — LessWronglesswrong.com