Group Hugging Theory | blog
kipp.ly · 344 words · saved by 4 readers
kipply's blog about stuff she does or reads about or observes
While one-on-one hugging is complicated enough as it is, the complications increase exponentially as number of people involved in the hug increase. There are many intricacies with the one-on-one hug, such as whether you should have arms above or below the shoulders, how long and tightly you should hug, etc. But the general logistics of how the hug comes together is fairly simple. With three people, it's also fairly doable to have a decent hug, as such; The three person hug is also fairly intuitive, I've rarely seen it done incorrectly. With a four person hug, a problem arises. You'll…
saved by
related reading
- James Mulhollandjmulholland.com
- Loneliness: The Four Circles of Belonging (2/2) - by jossboxx.substack.com
- The Gervais Principle IV: Wonderful Human Beings — Ribbonfarmribbonfarm.com
- Group chats rule the worldsriramk.com
- A Protocol for Optimizing Affection — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Dunbar's number - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Gathering Structuresmaggieappleton.com
- Robin Dunbar Explains Humans' Circles of Friendship - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- Radimentary | "Everything can be made radically elementary." ~Steven Rudichradimentary.wordpress.com
- The Art of Gathering_Summary (1).pdfirp-cdn.multiscreensite.com
- Of Pods, Squads, Crews & Gangs: Small Group Experiments In Radical Belongingjoelightfoot.org
- Hanging out: Americans report fewer friends. Could the cure be simple?slate.com