Futarchy As Meta Governance - by Robin Hanson
overcomingbias.com · 777 words · saved by 1 readers
While anyone can buy stock in public firms, private firms are instead held by a more concentrated and exclusive set of owners.
While anyone can buy stock in public firms, private firms are instead held by a more concentrated and exclusive set of owners. Such firms tend to make higher returns than public firms, and are more responsive to investment opportunities. They tend to be taken public when they reach a stable situation where managers can just “milk the cow”, while public firms tend to be taken private when they start to face many big new decisions. The basic idea is this: when CEOs of public firms make substantial and uncertain investments, they face the immediate judgment of market speculators, expressed in…
related reading
- Futarchy: Vote Values, But Bet Beliefsmason.gmu.edu
- Built to Own - Colossuscolossus.com
- .:: Phrack Magazine ::.phrack.org
- An Introduction to Futarchy | Ethereum Foundation Blogblog.ethereum.org
- Balance of powervitalik.eth.limo
- Posting, Priests, & Private Markets - Colossuscolossus.com
- Go Fork Yourself - Not Boring by Packy McCormicknotboring.co
- The Secret Diary of a ‘Sustainable Investor’ — Part 2 | by Tariq Fancy | Mediummedium.com
- Futarchy - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- The Secret Diary of a ‘Sustainable Investor’ — Part 1 | by Tariq Fancy | Mediummedium.com
- [1809.06421] A Flexible Design for Funding Public Goodsarxiv.org
- Venture Science — The Odin Research Directoryresearch.joinodin.com