Futarchy As Meta Governance - by Robin Hanson
overcomingbias.com · 777 words · saved by 1 readers
While anyone can buy stock in public firms, private firms are instead held by a more concentrated and exclusive set of owners.
While anyone can buy stock in public firms, private firms are instead held by a more concentrated and exclusive set of owners. Such firms tend to make higher returns than public firms, and are more responsive to investment opportunities. They tend to be taken public when they reach a stable situation where managers can just “milk the cow”, while public firms tend to be taken private when they start to face many big new decisions. The basic idea is this: when CEOs of public firms make substantial and uncertain investments, they face the immediate judgment of market speculators, expressed in…
related reading
- Futarchy: Vote Values, But Bet Beliefsmason.gmu.edu
- From prediction markets to info financevitalik.eth.limo
- On Private Governancehyperdimensional.co
- What's In a Valuation?investing1012dot0.substack.com
- An Introduction to Futarchy | Ethereum Foundation Blogblog.ethereum.org
- CEOs Don't Steer — Ribbonfarmribbonfarm.com
- If You're Not First, You're (Maybe? Potentially? Probably?) Last0xsmac.substack.com
- The Markets Aren't Alrightbenjaminfspector.com
- Balance of powervitalik.eth.limo
- The real reason Futarchists are doomed — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Schemas of Uncertaintyschemasofuncertainty.com
- Putting Private AI Governance into Actionsubstack.com