State Losses in Indonesia: Colonial Roots, Conflicting Objectives, and a Way Forward
berthofman.substack.com · 3,691 words · saved by 1 readers
Can governments govern effectively if every decision risks becoming a corruption case because it could cause a loss to the State?
The question in the sub-header lies at the centre of contemporary debates over corruption, public administration and constitutional governance in Indonesia. The doctrine of state losses and accountability shapes administrative behaviour, influences economic policy, affects commercial decision-making by state-owned enterprises and ultimately determines how Indonesia’s government functions. The issues goes well beyond Indonesia: how can a system of government be accountable and effective in an increasingly complex world, and with ever-rising demands on government? This discussion is close to…
saved by
related reading
- The procedure fetish - Niskanen Centerniskanencenter.org
- One Machine Runs on Conviction. The Other Runs on Budgets. | Tushar Panchaltusharpanchal.co
- The Making of Indian Statisticsaltermag.com
- A state capacity agenda for 2025 - Niskanen Centerniskanencenter.org
- Bibliography Archive - Harvard Law Schoolhls.harvard.edu
- Meditations on Doge — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Trouble with the View from Above | Cato Unboundcato-unbound.org
- Deep Dive: The Efficiency Formula | Contrary Researchresearch.contrary.com
- Anarchy, State, and Utopia | The Ted K Archivethetedkarchive.com
- Democracy and the Expert - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- "Good institutions" are tautological or unsupportedblog.karthiktadepalli.com
- Fiscal Federalismfederalism.org