The Case for Big Action to Regulate Artificial Intelligence

Federal oversight is necessary—not just to keep people safe, but also to scale technology in a sustainable way.

This essay originally appeared on The Information. In technology circles, people balk at the mere mention of government regulation. The naysayers argue it interferes with innovation and is a bad byproduct of big government. But history tells a different story. Transparent, accountable and expert oversight—even when implemented late or ineffectively at first—has proven to be an important part of scaling an economy. For better or worse, regulation is a necessary and proven boundary condition of capitalism. So why does the topic of regulation ignite such a visceral reaction, especially as it…

related reading

• The Case for Big Action to Regulate Artificial Intelligencechamath.substack.com
• Dario Amodei — Policy on the AI Exponentialdarioamodei.com
• AI as Normal Technology | Knight First Amendment Instituteknightcolumbia.org
• Dario Amodei — We Must Pace the Frontierdarioamodei.com
• Here's What I Think We Should Do | The Foundation for American Innovationthefai.org
• Togelius: AI safety regulation threatens our digital freedomstogelius.blogspot.com
• Radical Optionality — Governing Transformative AI Under Uncertaintyradical-optionality.ai
• The AI rules that US policymakers are considering, explainedvox.com
• Executive Summary - AI Now Instituteainowinstitute.org
• Beyond Safetyism: A Modest Proposal for Conservative AI Regulation - American Affairs Journalamericanaffairsjournal.org
• Is OpenAI Already Too Big to Fail?marketingaiinstitute.com
• [2304.04914] Regulatory Markets: The Future of AI Governancearxiv.org