flâneur

DŽIBUTI AND OTHERS v. LATVIA

hudoc.echr.coe.int · 1,815 words · saved by 1 readers

Art 14 (+ Art 2 P1) • Discrimination • Right to education • Non-discriminatory legislative amendments increasing the proportion of subjects taught in private schools in the only State language, Latvian, and thus reducing the use of Russian as the language of instruction • Russian-speaking and Latvian-speaking pupils in a relevantly similar situation • Legitimate aims of protecting and strengthening the Latvian language and ensuring the unity of the education system • Private schools considered to be part of the State educational system • General education standards applied to both private and public schools that issued graduation certificates • State’s rigorous approach in regulating private education sector justified • Legislative amendments implemented gradually and flexibly, with sufficient scope for adaptation to the needs of those affected • Private schools received public funding • Objective and reasonable justification • Conclusions reached in Valiullina and Others v. Latvia in

1 new 17596/23 17596/23 | Available only in French | Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) | Court (First Section) | 10/09/2026 No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Articl... more… No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial) 2 new 17596/23 17596/23 | Available only in French | Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) |…

related reading