Trapped Priors As A Basic Problem Of Rationality
astralcodexten.substack.com · 4,361 words · saved by 1 readers
P(A|B) = [P(A)*P(B|A)]/P(B), all the rest is commentary.
Introduction and review Last month I talked about van der Bergh et al’s work on the precision of sensory evidence, which introduced the idea of a trapped prior. I think this concept has far-reaching implications for the rationalist project as a whole. I want to re-derive it, explain it more intuitively, then talk about why it might be relevant for things like intellectual, political and religious biases. To review: the brain combines raw experience (eg sensations, memories) with context (eg priors, expectations, other related sensations and memories) to produce perceptions. You don’t…
related reading
- Trapped Priors As A Basic Problem Of Rationalityastralcodexten.substack.com
- It’s Bayes All The Way Upslatestarcodex.com
- Your Strength as a Rationalist — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Knowing About Biases Can Hurt People — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Making Beliefs Pay Rent (in Anticipated Experiences) — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Book Review: Surfing Uncertaintyslatestarcodex.com
- Making Beliefs Pay Rent (in Anticipated Experiences) — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Rationalization — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Biases: An Introductionreadthesequences.com
- Why Facts Don’t Change Our Minds | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- main.pdfdasnilanjan.com
- Singlethink — LessWronglesswrong.com