United States v. Winstar Corp.

United States v. Winstar Corp., 518 U.S. 839 (1996), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the United States Government had breached its contractual obligations. The court in Winstar rejected the Government's "unmistakability defense"—that surrenders of sovereign authority, such as the promise to refrain from regulatory changes, must appear in unmistakable terms in a contract in order to be enforceable.

United States v. Winstar Corp. - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 1996 United States Supreme Court case United States v. Winstar Corp. Supreme Court of the United States Argued April 24, 1996 Decided July 1, 1996 Full case name United States v. Winstar Corp., et al. Citations 518 U.S. 839 ( more ) 116 S.Ct. 2432; 135 L. Ed. 2d 964; 1996 U.S. LEXIS 4266 Case history Prior Winstar Corp. v. United States , 25 Cl. Ct. 541 (1992); reversed, 994 F.2d 797 ( Fed. Cir. 1993); on rehearing en banc , 64 F.3d 1531 (Fed. Cir. 1995); cert. granted, 516 U.S. 1087 (1996). Holdin

related reading

• Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
• Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
• Braunfeld v. Brown - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
• Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
• Streisand effect - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
• Everson v. Board of Education - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
• Opinions of the Court - 2025supremecourt.gov
• Minnesota Court Rules Websites Are Public Accommodations Under ADAogletree.com
• U.S. Reports: Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905). - service-ll-usrep-usrep197-usrep197011-usrep197011.pdftile.loc.gov
• Bush v. Gore - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
• Google has an illegal monopoly on search, judge rules. Here’s what’s next | CNN Businesscnn.com
• Zelman v. Simmons-Harris - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org