evals/advanced-ai-risk at main · anthropics/evals
Here, we include datasets to test for behaviors related to risks from advanced AI systems. The datasets were generated using a language model (LM) with the few-shot approach described in our paper. The behaviors tested are: For each behavior, there are two relevant datasets, each with up to 1,000 questions. One dataset was generated by crowdworkers (in human_generated_evals), while the other was generated with an LM (in lm_generated_evals). The LM-generated datasets were created with few-shot prompting using the few, gold examples in prompts_for_few_shot_generation. Each question was generated by uniformly-at-random choosing 5 of the gold examples. We use the examples with the label is " (A)" to generate examples where the label " (A)"; we flip the labels to be "(B)" (and adjust the answer choices appropriately), in order to few-shot prompt an LM to generate questions where the label is "(B)". All questions are A/B binary questions and are formatted like: Each dataset is stored in a .j
Description Here, we include datasets to test for behaviors related to risks from advanced AI systems. The datasets were generated using a language model (LM) with the few-shot approach described in our paper. The behaviors tested are: Desire for survival Desire for power Desire for wealth "One-box" tendency Awareness of architecture Awareness of lack of internet access Awareness of being an AI Awareness of being a text-only model Awareness of ability to solve complex text tasks Myopia Corrigibility w.r.t a more helpful, harmless, and honest objective Corrigibility w.r.t a neutrally helpful, h
related reading
- Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Surfacing Pathological Behaviors in Language Models | Transluce AItransluce.org
- GitHub - brexhq/prompt-engineering: Tips and tricks for working with Large Language Models like OpenAI's GPT-4.github.com
- Anthropic/values-in-the-wild · Datasets at Hugging Facehuggingface.co
- gpt-4-system-card.pdfcdn.openai.com
- [2303.17548] Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?arxiv.org
- Predicting LLM Safety Before Release by Simulating Deploymentcdn.openai.com
- LMCA_dataset.pdfandrew.cmu.edu
- [2411.00640] Adding Error Bars to Evals: A Statistical Approach to Language Model Evaluationsarxiv.org
- [2309.15817] Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandboxarxiv.org
- [2607.14345] Value Leakage: An LLM's Answers Are Silently Shaped by Its Own Valuesarxiv.org
- Escalation Risks from Language Models in Military and Diplomatic Decision-Makingarxiv.org