SWE-chat: Coding Agent Interactions From Real Users in the Wild
Abstract:AI coding agents are being adopted at scale, yet we lack empirical evidence on how people actually use them and how much of their output is useful in practice. We present SWE-chat, the first large-scale dataset of real coding agent sessions collected from open-source developers in the wild. The dataset currently contains 6,000 sessions, comprising more than 63,000 user prompts and 355,000 agent tool calls. SWE-chat is a living dataset; our collection pipeline automatically and continually discovers and processes sessions from public repositories. Leveraging SWE-chat, we provide an initial empirical characterization of real-world coding agent usage and failure modes. We find that coding patterns are bimodal: in 41% of sessions, agents author virtually all committed code ("vibe coding"), while in 23%, humans write all code themselves. Despite rapidly improving capabilities, coding agents remain inefficient in natural settings. Just 44% of all agent-produced code survives into user commits, and agent-written code introduces more security vulnerabilities than code authored by humans. Furthermore, users push back against agent outputs -- through corrections, failure reports, and interruptions -- in 44% of all turns. By capturing complete interaction traces with human vs. agent code authorship attribution, SWE-chat provides an empirical foundation for moving beyond curated benchmarks towards an evidence-based understanding of how AI agents perform in real developer workflows.
View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:AI coding agents are being adopted at scale, yet we lack empirical evidence on how people actually use them and how much of their output is useful in practice. We present SWE-chat, the first large-scale dataset of real coding agent sessions collected from open-source developers in the wild. The dataset currently contains 6,000 sessions, comprising more than 63,000 user prompts and 355,000 agent tool calls. SWE-chat is a living dataset; our collection pipeline automatically and continually discovers and processes sessions from public repositories.…
saved by
related reading
- [2510.05056] Modeling Student Learning with 3.8 Million Program Tracesarxiv.org
- [2511.04427] Speed at the Cost of Quality: How Cursor AI Increases Short-Term Velocity and Long-Term Complexity in Open-Source Projectsarxiv.org
- Senior SWE-Benchsenior-swe-bench.snorkel.ai
- Quantifying the Utility of User Simulators for Building Collaborative LLM Assistantsarxiv.org
- Professional Software Developers Don't Vibe, They Control: AI Agent Use for Coding in 2025arxiv.org
- How AI assistance impacts the formation of coding skills \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Debt Behind the AI Boom: A Large-Scale Empirical Study of AI-Generated Code in the Wildalphaxiv.org
- Why We Built Our Own Background Agentbuilders.ramp.com
- Toward Training Superintelligent Software Agents through Self-Play SWE-RLarxiv.org
- [2410.06992] SWE-Bench+: Enhanced Coding Benchmark for LLMsar5iv.labs.arxiv.org
- Measuring the Impact of Early-2025 AI on Experienced Open-Source Developer Productivity - METRmetr.org
- Introducing SWE-grep and SWE-grep-mini: RL for Multi-Turn, Fast Context Retrieval | Cognitioncognition.ai