[2309.11495] Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Models

Abstract:Generation of plausible yet incorrect factual information, termed hallucination, is an unsolved issue in large language models. We study the ability of language models to deliberate on the responses they give in order to correct their mistakes. We develop the Chain-of-Verification (CoVe) method whereby the model first (i) drafts an initial response; then (ii) plans verification questions to fact-check its draft; (iii) answers those questions independently so the answers are not biased by other responses; and (iv) generates its final verified response. In experiments, we show CoVe decreases hallucinations across a variety of tasks, from list-based questions from Wikidata, closed book MultiSpanQA and longform text generation.

View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Generation of plausible yet incorrect factual information, termed hallucination, is an unsolved issue in large language models. We study the ability of language models to deliberate on the responses they give in order to correct their mistakes. We develop the Chain-of-Verification (CoVe) method whereby the model first (i) drafts an initial response; then (ii) plans verification questions to fact-check its draft; (iii) answers those questions independently so the answers are not biased by other responses; and (iv) generates its final verified response.…

saved by

• Eric Chang

related reading

• [2201.11903] Chain of Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelsarxiv.org
• [2412.06769] Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacearxiv.org
• Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacearxiv.org
• [2202.03629] Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationarxiv.org
• [2512.11949] Neural Chameleons: Language Models Can Learn to Hide Their Thoughts from Unseen Activation Monitorsarxiv.org
• Hallucination Mitigation using Agentic AI Natural Language-Based Frameworksarxiv.org
• [2510.24941] Can Aha Moments Be Fake? Towards Quantifying Decorative and True Thinking in Chain-of-Thoughtarxiv.org
• [2603.07267] How to Steal Reasoning Without Reasoning Tracesarxiv.org
• [2507.11473] Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safetyarxiv.org
• Prediction, Explanation, or Over-interpretation?elena-baixy.github.io
• 2308.03958arxiv.org
• Making LLMs Say What They Think: Measuring and Improving CoT-Interpretability Alignmentarxiv.org