The Most Elegant Configuration Language
chshersh.com · 5,237 words · saved by 1 readers
Dmitrii Kovanikov's Personas Web Space
“If nothing magically works, nothing magically breaks” © Carson Gross I adore simplicity. Especially composable simplicity. If I know two things A and B, I want to automatically know the result of their composition. What I don’t want is reading a 1000-page book explaining all the edge cases and undefined behaviours happening in the process. Here composable simplicity equals to reusable knowledge. Examples: If two functions f and g are pure, their composition is automatically pure. If I have two IDE plugins A and B that work in isolation, and I enable both of them simultaneously, I…
saved by
related reading
- Cognitive load is what mattersminds.md
- Command Line Interface Guidelinesclig.dev
- TOML: Tom's Obvious Minimal Languagetoml.io
- Semantic Domain: The Geometry of Interaction, as an OCaml programsemantic-domain.blogspot.com
- Darklangdarklang.com
- Kleisli Categories | Bartosz Milewski's Programming Cafebartoszmilewski.com
- The Clojure Style Guideguide.clojure.style
- Lambda World 2024 - Concrete Functional Programming - Kamila Szewczykyoutube.com
- simple is not smalljyn.dev
- Destroy All Values: Designing Deinitialization in Programming Languages - Faultloregankra.github.io
- What even is compiler correctness?williamjbowman.com
- Prompts are code, .json/.md files are statemariozechner.at