The Four Pillars: A Hypothesis for Countering Catastrophic Biological Risk — EA Forum
forum.effectivealtruism.org · 4,388 words · saved by 1 readers
Biological risks are more severe than has been widely appreciated. Recent discussions of mirror bacteria highlight an extreme scenario: a single orga…
Biological risks are more severe than has been widely appreciated. Recent discussions of mirror bacteria highlight an extreme scenario: a single organism that could infect and kill humans, plants, and animals, exhibits environmental persistence in soil or dust, and might be capable of spreading worldwide within several months. In the worst-case scenario, this could pose an existential risk to humanity, especially if the responses/countermeasures were inadequate. Less severe pandemic pathogens could still cause hundreds of millions (or billions) of casualties if they were engineered to cause…
saved by
related reading
- The Four Pillars: A Hypothesis for Countering Catastrophic Biological Riskdefensesindepth.bio
- How I think about catastrophic biological risk (part I): risk breakdown by type of responsedefensesindepth.bio
- Reasons to be pessimistic (and optimistic) on the future of biosecurityowlposting.com
- Preventing catastrophic pandemics | 80,000 Hours80000hours.org
- *Reflective Disequilibrium*: Envisioning a world immune to global catastrophic biological risksreflectivedisequilibrium.blogspot.com
- 10 big projects for reducing bio x-riskdefensesindepth.bio
- How I think about catastrophic biological risk (part II): risk breakdown by type of preventiondefensesindepth.bio
- Interceptinterceptfund.com
- How to Prevent the Next Pandemic—Asteriskasteriskmag.com
- “Designer bugs”: how the next pandemic might come from a labvox.com
- Ask not why would you work in biology, but rather: why wouldn't you?owlposting.com
- Q&A: How ‘Mirror Bacteria’ Could Take a Devastating Toll on Humanity | Yale School of Medicinemedicine.yale.edu