Facial+Recognition+is+Plutonium+-+Stark.pdf
static1.squarespace.com · 3,422 words · saved by 1 readers
N/A
feature Facial Recognition is the Plutonium of AI It’s dangerous, racializing, and has few legitimate uses; facial recognition needs regulation and control on par with nuclear waste. By Luke Stark DOI: 10.1145/3313129 W hen, in 1941, Glenn T. Seaborg and his colleagues at the University of California Berkeley isolated—and subsequently named—plutonium, the radioactive element 93, Seaborg reportedly suggested the periodic symbol Pu for the discovery. According to Seaborg, it “sounded like the…
saved by
related reading
- The Perpetual Line-Up - Center on Privacy and Technology at Georgetown Law - 121616.pdfperpetuallineup.org
- Who Should Stop Unethical A.I.? | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Which Future?michaelnotebook.com
- Reframing AI Safety as a Neverending Institutional Challenge – Stephen Casperstephencasper.com
- Motivating The Case for Decentralized Social Identity: Part One - RadicalxChangeradicalxchange.org
- Humanness in the Age of AIworldcoin.org
- Superintelligence: The Idea That Eats Smart Peopleidlewords.com
- Brain dump on the diversity of AI risk | Jascha’s blogsohl-dickstein.github.io
- secret-loyalties-whitepaper.pdfformationresearch.com
- There Is No A.I. | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- GitHub - daviddao/awful-ai: 😈Awful AI is a curated list to track current scary usages of AI - hoping to raise awareness · GitHubgithub.com
- Microsoft Word - 03_Trites Volume 11 issue 2 Final.docxgmj-canadianedition.ca