On Inevitability
borretti.me · 2,002 words · saved by 2 readers
Why superintelligent AI is not inevitable.
There’s a widespread belief that artificial superintelligence (ASI) is inevitable. In this post, I argue that this is false, and believing it is upstream of a lot of bad discourse. Why do people believe it? It’s easy to believe. Samuel Butler, already in 1863, observed that machines are improving faster than humans are improving. Today, AI systems are gaining capabilities much faster than humans: in five years we went from systems that can barely string together a sentence to autonomous cybercrime. Biological nervous systems have many virtues, like being power-efficient (because they run…
saved by
related reading
- The Artificial Intelligence Revolution: Part 2 - Wait But Whywaitbutwhy.com
- The Artificial Intelligence Revolution: Part 1 - Wait But Whywaitbutwhy.com
- The Problem — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Superintelligence: The Idea That Eats Smart Peopleidlewords.com
- Notes on Existential Risk from Artificial Superintelligencemichaelnotebook.com
- Why AGI Will Not Happen - Tim Dettmerstimdettmers.com
- The 'Don't Look Up' Thinking That Could Doom Us With AItime.com
- Existential Risk from AI: An Exposition for Mathematiciansalkjash.github.io
- Nick Bostrom’s Home Pagenickbostrom.com
- Unfalsifiable stories of doom | Mechanize, Inc.mechanize.work
- The Future is for Everyonemeta.com
- Center for a Stateless Society >> Review: Superintelligence — Paths, Dangers, Strategiesc4ss.org