On Inevitability
borretti.me · 2,002 words · saved by 2 readers
Why superintelligent AI is not inevitable.
There’s a widespread belief that artificial superintelligence (ASI) is inevitable. In this post, I argue that this is false, and believing it is upstream of a lot of bad discourse. Why do people believe it? It’s easy to believe. Samuel Butler, already in 1863, observed that machines are improving faster than humans are improving. Today, AI systems are gaining capabilities much faster than humans: in five years we went from systems that can barely string together a sentence to autonomous cybercrime. Biological nervous systems have many virtues, like being power-efficient (because they run…
saved by
related reading
- The Artificial Intelligence Revolution: Part 2 - Wait But Whywaitbutwhy.com
- The Artificial Intelligence Revolution: Part 1 - Wait But Whywaitbutwhy.com
- Why AGI Will Not Happen - Tim Dettmerstimdettmers.com
- II. From AGI to Superintelligence: the Intelligence Explosion - SITUATIONAL AWARENESSsituational-awareness.ai
- The future of AI is already written | Mechanize, Inc.mechanize.work
- The Problem — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Technology is not inevitablemaxlangenkamp.substack.com
- A Potentially Rather Unpopular Opinion on AIrichdecibels.substack.com
- Why AI Will Save the World | Andreessen Horowitza16z.com
- maxlangenkamp.me/posts/tech_not_inevitable/maxlangenkamp.me
- The 'Don't Look Up' Thinking That Could Doom Us With AItime.com
- The Risk of Gradual Disempowerment from AIthezvi.substack.com