Inevitability of Recentralization
Notes on Gordon Brander’s Decentralization enables permissionless innovation, Centralization is Inevitable and Redecentralization To be efficient is to be fragile, and to be fragile, over the long run, is to go extinct.
Notes on Gordon Brander’s Decentralization enables permissionless innovation , Centralization is Inevitable and Redecentralization To be efficient is to be fragile, and to be fragile, over the long run, is to go extinct. Network Models See also: network theory In 1959 RAND, a Californian think-tank, assigned Paul Baran, a young engineer at that time, to develop a communication system that can survive a Soviet nuclear attack. He found that: The original centralized communication system is obviously vulnerable as the destruction of the hub would destroy communication between the end stations. Th
related reading
- Centralization is inevitablesubconscious.substack.com
- Decentralization enables permissionless innovationsubconscious.substack.com
- Sufficient Decentralization for Social Networks - Varun Srinivasanvarunsrinivasan.com
- The Meaning of Decentralizationmedium.com
- Centralization and Internet Standardsietf.org
- Do human designed systems always end up centralized? | by Alex Meyer | Maximum Tinkering | Mediummedium.com
- Immunology for the Internet Age • Blogurbit.org
- Paul Baran and the Origins of the Internet | RANDrand.org
- Why decentralization matters — cdixoncdixon.org
- mek.fyi | The centralized webmek.fyi
- Reconnected — Real Lifereallifemag.com
- Network Science by Albert-László Barabásinetworksciencebook.com