We should be wary about what Big History overlooks in its myth | Aeon Essays
aeon.co · 4,276 words · saved by 1 readers
Sweeping the human story into a cosmic tale is a thrill but we should be wary about what is overlooked in the grandeur
Big History burst on to the scene 30 years ago, promising to reinvigorate a stale and overspecialised academic discipline by situating the human past within a holistic account at a cosmic scale. The goal was to produce a story of life that could be discerned by synthesising cosmology, geology, evolutionary biology, archaeology and anthropology. This universal story, in turn, would provide students with a basic framework for their subsequent studies – and for life itself. Big History also promised to fill the existential void left by the ostensible erosion of religious beliefs. Three decades…
related reading
- Big History - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Cosmos: working notes, 1michaelnotebook.com
- Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankindgoodreads.com
- On Progress and Historical Change – Ex Urbeexurbe.com
- The Dawn of Everythingen.wikipedia.org
- The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity: Graeber, David, Wengrow, David: 9780374157357: Amazon.com: Booksamazon.com
- After Dawn: Resurgent Archaeology and The Dawn of Everything – Chicago Reviewchicagoreview.org
- The third magicnoahpinion.substack.com
- Putting Time In Perspective – UPDATEDwaitbutwhy.com
- Alan Macfarlane: Concepts of time and the world we live infortnightlyreview.co.uk
- Intimations of a New Worldviewbrettandersen.substack.com
- Coursetextscoursetexts.org