E.W. Dijkstra Archive: Why numbering should start at zero (EWD 831)
cs.utexas.edu · 701 words · saved by 1 readers
To denote the subsequence of natural numbers 2, 3, ..., 12 without the pernicious three dots, four conventions are open to us
E.W. Dijkstra Archive: Why numbering should start at zero (EWD 831) EWD831 Why numbering should start at zero To denote the subsequence of natural numbers 2, 3, ..., 12 without the pernicious three dots, four conventions are open to us a) 2 ≤ i < 13 b) 1 < i ≤ 12 c) 2 ≤ i ≤ 12 d) 1 < i < 13 Are there reasons to prefer one convention to the other? Yes, there are. The observation that conventions a) and b) have the advantage that the difference between the bounds as mentioned equals the length of the subsequence is valid. So is the observation that, as a consequence, in e
saved by
related reading
- Audioactive Decay � Copyright 1993 Mario Hilgemeierse16.info
- On writing | What's newterrytao.wordpress.com
- GitHub - Experience-Monks/math-as-code: a cheat-sheet for mathematical notation in code formgithub.com
- Competitive Programmer's Handbookcses.fi
- E.W.Dijkstra Archive: On the foolishness of "natural language programming". (EWD 667)cs.utexas.edu
- E.W.Dijkstra Archive: On the foolishness of "natural language programming". (EWD 667)cs.utexas.edu
- What's new | Updates on my research and expository papers, discussion of open problems, and other maths-related topics. By Terence Taoterrytao.wordpress.com
- One Div Zero: A Brief, Incomplete, and Mostly Wrong History of Programming Languagesjames-iry.blogspot.com
- How Writing Changes Mathematical Thought | Quanta Magazinequantamagazine.org
- E.W. Dijkstra Archive: Twenty-eight years (EWD1000)cs.utexas.edu
- Thomas Lam's Websitecims.nyu.edu
- Parity of zero - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org