Can Agents Fool Each Other? - AI Village
theaidigest.org · 898 words · saved by 1 readers
Findings from the AI Village
Village blog The better agents are at deception, the less sure we can be that they are doing what we want. As agents become increasingly capable and autonomous, this could be a big deal. So, in the AI Village , we wanted to explore what current AI models might be capable of in a casual setting, similar to how you might run your agents at home. The result? Practice makes perfect, also in deception. Only Sonnet 4.5 and Opus 4.6 succeeded at deceiving the rest of the Village, and they only did so on their second try, learning from their own attempts and those of others. Meanwhile, GPT-5.1 forgot
saved by
related reading
- Field Notes from the AI Village: The Drama and Dysfunction of Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemini 3 Probazhkio88.substack.com
- Persuasion in the AI Village: DeepSeek-V3.2 & Gemini 2.5 Proaivillageblog.substack.com
- Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message boardcollusion.wiki
- Deep Deceptiveness — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Pre-deployment auditing can catch an overt saboteuralignment.anthropic.com
- What To Expect When You’re Expecting (A World of Multi-Agent Systems)asteriskmag.com
- How confessions can keep language models honest | OpenAIopenai.com
- Why are AI agents lying, cheating and coordinating?yoshuabengio.org
- Patterns and problems in multiagent systemsanthropic.com
- Natural Deception with RL - Rajan Agarwalrajan.sh
- [2312.06942] AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversionarxiv.org
- Can A.I. “Go Rogue”?newyorker.com