Our Fundamental Right To Shame And Shun The New York Times
popehat.substack.com · 3,526 words · saved by 1 readers
What the NYT Cancel Culture Editorial Got Wrong, And What It Got Right
Our Fundamental Right To Shame And Shun The New York Times What the NYT Cancel Culture Editorial Got Wrong, And What It Got Right Ken White Mar 22, 2022 54 2 3 Share If you want to be a decent person, you should care about how you treat other people. What else is important in life? It’s right and fit that we discuss how we can treat each other better. Our chat can’t be limited to not punching your little sister or not eating your roommate’s leftover Pad Thai. Most of the time we treat other people kindly or cruelly by talking — talking to them or about them. If we want to be better people, we
saved by
related reading
- Lukianoff And Defining Cancel Culture - by Scott Alexanderastralcodexten.com
- Some Practical Considerations Before Descending Into An Orgy Of Vengeanceastralcodexten.com
- Amia Srinivasan · Cancelled: Can I speak freely?lrb.co.uk
- Was Nikole Hannah-Jones Cancelled? - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- Is the Internet Making Culture Worse?—Asteriskasteriskmag.com
- In Favor of Niceness, Community, and Civilizationslatestarcodex.com
- What You Can't Saypaulgraham.com
- The Real Problem at Yale Is Not Free Speechletter.palladiummag.com
- Can Things Be Both Popular And Silenced? | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- Free speech is in troublesubstack.com
- Decoupling vs Contextualizing Norms — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Women's Tears Win in the Marketplace of Ideasrichardhanania.com