Abundant intelligences: placing AI within Indigenous knowledge frameworks | AI & SOCIETY | Springer Nature Link
The current trajectory of artificial intelligence development suffers from fundamental epistemological shortcomings, resulting in the systematic operationalization of bias against non-white, non-male, and non-Western peoples. We argue that these failings are, in part, the result of certain Western rationalist epistemologies that exclude many ways of knowing about the world, and therefore they cannot provide a sufficient foundation on which to adequately, robustly, and humanely conceptualize intelligence. We present a new research agenda, Abundant Intelligences, an Indigenous-led, Indigenous-majority international, interdisciplinary research program that imagines anew how to conceptualize and design artificial intelligence (AI) based on Indigenous knowledge (IK) systems. Abundant Intelligences draws on the rich plurality of Indigenous knowledge systems, bringing together diverse sets of thought, culture, and protocol together. We show IK systems provide one way to rebuild AI’s epistemological foundations and transform these tools’ current role in reinforcing colonial practices of exclusion, extraction, manipulation, and eradication into engines of abundance that enable us to care better for ourselves, our communities, and our world. Our proposition is to fully engage with AI to explore how different conceptions of intelligence could be embodied in these technologies. In this paper, we present the tenets of the research program in detail, account for our methodological approach, describe the impact and limitations, and conclude on a discussion of the implications of the program.
“We are what we imagine. Our best destiny is to imagine…who, and what, and that we are.” N. Scott Momaday (1998) 1 Introduction The artificial intelligence (AI) industry–academic complex does not have an ethics problem, it does, however, have an epistemology problem. The current trajectory of AI development suffers from fundamental epistemological shortcomings, resulting in the systematic operationalization of bias against non-white, non-male, and non-Western peoples. As such, researchers are continually discovering severe flaws in current approaches to creating AI systems (Caliskan et…
saved by
related reading
- Abundant Intelligencesabundant-intelligences.net
- AI as Normal Technology | Knight First Amendment Instituteknightcolumbia.org
- [2007.04068] Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligencearxiv.org
- Using Artificial Intelligence to Augment Human Intelligencedistill.pub
- [1911.01547] On the Measure of Intelligencearxiv.org
- Towards a sociotechnical ecology of artificial intelligence: power, accountability, and governance in a global contextlink.springer.com
- Intentionally Designing the Future of AIgoodfire.ai
- The Artificiality of Alignmentjoinreboot.org
- Power to the People? Opportunities and Challenges for Participatory AIarxiv.org
- A new vision of artificial intelligence for the people | MIT Technology Reviewtechnologyreview.com
- AI and Epistemics: The Good, Bad and Uglyforethought.org
- [2605.10310] Positive Alignment: Artificial Intelligence for Human Flourishingarxiv.org