roon on X: "@TheZvi I quote tweeted Evan a few days ago agreeing but deleted it because I don’t like the false precision of the doom numbers - i claim there is a quite low but real chance of human extinction from machine intelligence - no matter how low it is in absolute terms, it is much higher on" / X
I quote tweeted Evan a few days ago agreeing but deleted it because I don’t like the false precision of the doom numbers - i claim there is a quite low but real chance of human extinction from machine intelligence - no matter how low it is in absolute terms, it is much higher on the orders of magn…
I quote tweeted Evan a few days ago agreeing but deleted it because I don’t like the false precision of the doom numbers - i claim there is a quite low but real chance of human extinction from machine intelligence - no matter how low it is in absolute terms, it is much higher on the orders of magnitude scale than any other human or nonhuman activity, and must be taken with grave seriousness by governments and ai companies across the world, as possibly the only matter of importance today - it can and will be mitigated if the right research is done and proper precautions are taken and we are…
saved by
related reading
- Jacob Coxon Warns of Human Extinction and Triggers a Preference Cascadethezvi.substack.com
- Where I agree and disagree with Eliezer — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Artificiality of Alignmentjoinreboot.org
- Existential Risk from AI: An Exposition for Mathematiciansalkjash.github.io
- The Problem — LessWronglesswrong.com
- My views on “doom” — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Post 45: Simplify EA Pitches to “Holy Shit, X-Risk” - Neel Nandaneelnanda.io
- The White House agrees you have a small brainerikhoel.substack.com
- Notes on Existential Risk from Artificial Superintelligencemichaelnotebook.com
- Many arguments for AI x-risk are wrong — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- The case against AI alignment — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Do people seriously worry about existential risk from AI?aisafety.info