Defining “Viability”...and Who Decides What Counts? - Spacing Vancouver | Spacing Vancouver
There’s a word that shows up a lot in housing debates—one that tends to end conversations rather than deepen them: viability. I hear this word constantly in comments to articles I write and in the media covering housing—particularly those that focus on supply-side solutions to the housing crisis. The critique goes something like this: “Sure,Continue reading "Defining “Viability”…and Who Decides What Counts?"
There’s a word that shows up a lot in housing debates—one that tends to end conversations rather than deepen them: viability . I hear this word constantly in comments to articles I write and in the media covering housing—particularly those that focus on supply-side solutions to the housing crisis. The critique goes something like this: “Sure, it’s easy to critique new development. But if the project isn’t viable, it won’t get built. So, what’s your alternative?” Fair enough. But that kind of response often smuggles in a much bigger assumption: that the only projects worth discussing are the on
related reading
- Promised Land: Housing from Commodification to Cooperatione-flux.com
- Everything you think you know about homelessness is wrongnoahpinion.substack.com
- The market can’t fix the housing crisisthestar.com
- 'At a reckoning point': Vancouver defers fees to prevent new housing slowdown | Daily Hive | Urbanizeddailyhive.com
- The Avery Review | MD2207: Community-Led Housing in Londonaveryreview.com
- Innovative Solutions for the Housing Crisisssir.org
- The public housing miracle that never happenedtheargumentmag.com
- The Left-NIMBY canon - by Noah Smith - Noahpinionnoahpinion.blog
- Left-Wing NIMBYism Strikes Out – Againlegal-planet.org
- Why Voters Haven’t Been Buying the Case for Building — Shelterforce Shelterforceshelterforce.org
- How I'm Voting for Mayor in NYC's Democratic Primarymaximumnewyork.com
- Alternative Provisionsubstack.com