The uncomfortable problem with the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade - Vox
vox.com · 4,908 words · saved by 1 readers
The Constitution doesn’t tell us which rights it protects, and now the power to decide that question rests with people like Samuel Alito.
Politics The uncomfortable problem with Roe v. Wade The Constitution doesn’t tell us which rights it protects, and now the power to decide that question rests with people like Samuel Alito. by Ian Millhiser Aug 2, 2022, 11:30 AM UTC Amanda Northrop/Vox Part Of The Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade see all updates Ian Millhiser is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he focuses on the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the decline of liberal democracy in the United States. He received a JD from Duke University and is the author of two books on the Supreme Court. I believe that the Constitut
related reading
- The Real Fight for Abortion Rights Is Not in the Courts or Congress | The New Republicnewrepublic.com
- POLITICO Playbook: Breaking down Alito's Roe bombshell - POLITICOpolitico.com
- The Law on Trial - The Driftthedriftmag.com
- The supreme court’s voting rights decision is a death knell for American democracy | Moira Donegan | The Guardiantheguardian.com
- With Roe v. Wade overturned, which states would restrict or protect abortion rights? - CBS Newscbsnews.com
- Philosophers On the Ethics and Politics of Abortion - Daily Nousdailynous.com
- Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is right about affirmative action and the Constitution | Voxvox.com
- Your Body, My Choice | Dayna Tortoricinplusonemag.com
- Some Supreme Court Justices Are More Political Than Othersnymag.com
- Fetal Rites - The Driftthedriftmag.com
- Should Abortion Providers Break the Law?theintercept.com
- The Yale Review | Maggie Doherty: “The Abortion Stories We Tell”yalereview.org