flâneur

[2606.04929] Sequential Data Poisoning in LLM Post-Training

arxiv.org · 7,899 words · saved by 1 readers

Abstract:LLM post-training proceeds through multiple stages, e.g., supervised fine-tuning (SFT) followed by reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) or direct preference optimization (DPO), where each stage draws data from different, potentially untrusted sources. Existing literature assumes data poisoning attacks may occur at each training stage, but neglects the possibility of multiple attackers. To study the trustworthiness of the entire post-training pipeline, we propose the threat model of sequential data poisoning, where multiple adversaries separately poison the SFT and preference datasets. Under this threat model, we identify the single-attacker illusion: each adversary, evaluated in isolation, appears to pose a negligible threat. Yet when adversaries collaborate across stages, the true vulnerability is revealed. In the SFT $\to$ DPO pipeline, their contributions are additive: splitting a fixed poison budget across stages outperforms concentrating it in either stage alone. In the SFT $\to$ PPO pipeline, their contributions are complementary: neither SFT nor reward model poisoning succeeds individually, yet their combination does. These findings show that security analyses of individual post-training stages systematically underestimate compound vulnerabilities that emerge only from their interaction. Code is available at this https URL.

Sequential Data Poisoning in LLM Post-Training∗ Jack Sanderson1,4 Yihan Wang2 Xiaoqian Lu3,4 Gautam Kamath2,4 Yiwei Lu3,4† 1 2 3 4 University of Chicago University of Waterloo University of Ottawa Vector Institute…

saved by

related reading