Kicking the Tires: A Voluntary Path to Pre-deployment AI Vetting | Lawfare
lawfaremedia.org · 1,666 words · saved by 1 readers
The administration lacks authority to mandate frontier model vetting—but existing CAISI and CISA tools enable a voluntary alternative.
Dean W. Ball Kevin Frazier @kevintfrazier kevintfrazier.bsky.social Meet The Authors Subscribe to Lawfare The Trump administration is weighing the creation of a "review system" for frontier AI models. According to the New York Times, in this proposed approach, AI labs would provide the federal government with "first access" to "get ahead" of models with significant cyber capabilities, presumably such as Anthropic's Mythos. It's unclear what legal authority would allow the president to accomplish these goals-specifically, mandating labs to undergo a vetting process and then sharing any essentia
saved by
related reading
- What Should Be Donehyperdimensional.co
- Off Target | CNAScnas.org
- Making CAISI the AI agency the US needstransformernews.ai
- Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security – The White Housewhitehouse.gov
- America’s AI Action Planwhitehouse.gov
- Frontier safety blueprintcdn.openai.com
- Radical Optionality — Governing Transformative AI Under Uncertaintyradical-optionality.ai
- Emerging processes for frontier AI safety - GOV.UKgov.uk
- How Should the US Prepare for Increasingly Automated AI R&D? | IFPifp.org
- How to pace the US frontierblog.aifutures.org
- Responsible Innovation at the Frontier - Americans for Responsible Innovationari.us
- Common Elements of Frontier AI Safety Policiesmetr.org