Kicking the Tires: A Voluntary Path to Pre-deployment AI Vetting | Lawfare
lawfaremedia.org · 1,666 words · saved by 1 readers
The administration lacks authority to mandate frontier model vetting—but existing CAISI and CISA tools enable a voluntary alternative.
Dean W. Ball Kevin Frazier @kevintfrazier kevintfrazier.bsky.social Meet The Authors Subscribe to Lawfare The Trump administration is weighing the creation of a "review system" for frontier AI models. According to the New York Times, in this proposed approach, AI labs would provide the federal government with "first access" to "get ahead" of models with significant cyber capabilities, presumably such as Anthropic's Mythos. It's unclear what legal authority would allow the president to accomplish these goals-specifically, mandating labs to undergo a vetting process and then sharing any essentia
saved by
related reading
- The Moonshot - by Anton Leicht - Threading the Needlewriting.antonleicht.me
- What Should Be Donehyperdimensional.co
- Making CAISI the AI agency the US needstransformernews.ai
- How to pace the US frontierblog.aifutures.org
- Off Target | CNAScnas.org
- Can You Nationalize a Frontier AI Lab? - by John Allardjhallard.substack.com
- How Should the US Prepare for Increasingly Automated AI R&D? | IFPifp.org
- America’s AI Action Planwhitehouse.gov
- Radical Optionality — Governing Transformative AI Under Uncertaintyradical-optionality.ai
- Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security – The White Housewhitehouse.gov
- Who’s doing what on AI security in the US government?horizonlaunchpad.substack.com
- AI models can be dangerous before public deploymentmetr.org