flâneur

Why Computers Won’t Make Themselves Smarter | The New Yorker

newyorker.com · 3,534 words · saved by 1 readers

We fear and yearn for “the singularity.” But it will probably never come.

Save this story Save this story In the eleventh century, St. Anselm of Canterbury proposed an argument for the existence of God that went roughly like this: God is, by definition, the greatest being that we can imagine; a God that doesn’t exist is clearly not as great as a God that does exist; ergo, God must exist. This is known as the ontological argument, and there are enough people who find it convincing that it’s still being discussed, nearly a thousand years later. Some critics of the ontological argument contend that it essentially defines a being into existence, and that that is not how

saved by

related reading