Artists can now opt out of generative AI. It’s not enough.
normaltech.ai · 1,024 words · saved by 1 readers
Opting out is the latest example of generative AI developers externalizing costs.
Text-to-image models like Stable Diffusion and DALL-E are trained on vast amounts of data collected online—including images created by artists, without their consent. In response, artists developed the website Have I been trained, which allows any artist to check whether their art was used to train Stable Diffusion. It also allows artists to individually mark their images as "opted-out" of training data for generative AI. Stability AI said that it would honor opt-out requests made using this tool. Over 80 million artworks have been opted out in the last few months. But will this help…
related reading
- This artist is dominating AI-generated art. And he’s not happy about it. | MIT Technology Reviewtechnologyreview.com
- Anyone can use this AI art generator — that’s the risk | The Vergetheverge.com
- Why A.I. Isn’t Going to Make Art | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- suchir.net/fair_use.htmlsuchir.net
- This new data poisoning tool lets artists fight back against generative AI | MIT Technology Reviewtechnologyreview.com
- Lonely Surfaces: On AI-generated Imagestheconvivialsociety.substack.com
- Is using Lensa art theft? | The ethics of AI generated art – Olu Onlineolu.online
- AI: Digital artist's work copied more times than Picassobbc.com
- LAION-5B, Stable Diffusion 1.5, and the Original Sin of Generative AI | TechPolicy.Presstechpolicy.press
- Invasive Diffusion: How one unwilling illustrator found herself turned into an AI model - Waxy.orgwaxy.org
- AI #80: Never Will It Ever - by Zvi Mowshowitzthezvi.substack.com
- Machina Lucida: Reflections on Artificial Images by Lucas Gelfondspikeartmagazine.com