The Unpolitical Animal | The New Yorker
newyorker.com · 3,977 words · saved by 1 readers
How political science understands voters.
Save this story Save this story In every Presidential-election year, there are news stories about undecided voters, people who say that they are perplexed about which candidate’s positions make the most sense. They tell reporters things like “I’d like to know more about Bush’s plan for education,” or “I’m worried that Kerry’s ideas about Social Security don’t add up.” They say that they are thinking about issues like “trust,” and whether the candidate cares about people like them. To voters who identify strongly with a political party, the undecided voter is almost an alien life form. For them
related reading
- Summary of Achen and Bartel’s Democracy for Realists – The Universe from an Intentional Stancecasparoesterheld.com
- Political Divides, Conspiracy Theories and Divergent News Sources Heading Into 2020 Electionpewresearch.org
- You're probably wrong about how things have changedexperimental-history.com
- The Missing Ingredient in Our Democracy: Math (Opinion)edweek.org
- Why Smart People Believe Stupid Thingsgurwinder.substack.com
- Voters Have a Message for Democratstheatlantic.com
- How People Think · Collaborative Fundcollaborativefund.com
- Generically partisan: Polarization in political communication | Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Sciencestatmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
- interfluidity >> Your theory of politics is wronginterfluidity.com
- Investment theory of party competition - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- I told you sosamkriss.substack.com
- Why Facts Don’t Change Our Minds | The New Yorkernewyorker.com