The Unpolitical Animal | The New Yorker
newyorker.com · 3,977 words · saved by 1 readers
How political science understands voters.
Save this story Save this story In every Presidential-election year, there are news stories about undecided voters, people who say that they are perplexed about which candidate’s positions make the most sense. They tell reporters things like “I’d like to know more about Bush’s plan for education,” or “I’m worried that Kerry’s ideas about Social Security don’t add up.” They say that they are thinking about issues like “trust,” and whether the candidate cares about people like them. To voters who identify strongly with a political party, the undecided voter is almost an alien life form. For them
related reading
- Politicians Think Voters Are Dumb. Are They Right?youtube.com
- Knowing About Biases Can Hurt People — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Art of Decision-Making | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Voters Have a Message for Democratstheatlantic.com
- You're probably wrong about how things have changedexperimental-history.com
- Why Facts Don’t Change Our Minds | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Hollow Man | The Editorsnplusonemag.com
- The Median Voter is a Maoistsubstack.com
- interfluidity >> Your theory of politics is wronginterfluidity.com
- Political Divides, Conspiracy Theories and Divergent News Sources Heading Into 2020 Electionpewresearch.org
- 12 Theses on Politics - by Matt Reardon - From Matterfrommatter.substack.com
- A very simple explanation for why politics is brokenvox.com