‘I do not think ethical surveillance can exist’: Rumman Chowdhury on accountability in AI | Artificial intelligence (AI) | The Guardian
One of the leading thinkers on artificial intelligence discusses responsibility, ‘moral outsourcing’ and bridging the gap between people and technology
Rumman Chowdhury’s approach is staunch middle-ness: welcoming of progress and firm in her insistence on accountability. Photograph: David J Phillip/AP View image in fullscreen Rumman Chowdhury’s approach is staunch middle-ness: welcoming of progress and firm in her insistence on accountability. Photograph: David J Phillip/AP AI (artificial intelligence) This article is more than 3 years old Interview ‘I do not think ethical surveillance can exist’: Rumman Chowdhury on accountability in AI This article is more than 3 years old Paula Aceves One of the leading thinkers on artificial intelligence
saved by
related reading
- Executive Summary - AI Now Instituteainowinstitute.org
- The Artificiality of Alignmentjoinreboot.org
- Dario Amodei — The Adolescence of Technologydarioamodei.com
- Oversight Assistants: Turning Compute into Understandingbounded-regret.ghost.io
- The Machines Lack Honour — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Building Technology to Drive AI Governancebounded-regret.ghost.io
- Dario Amodei — The Adolescence of Technologydarioamodei.com
- Why AI Will Save the World | Andreessen Horowitza16z.com
- Stop talking about AI ethics. It’s time to talk about power.technologyreview.com
- Why we should use AI to expand what it means to be human | Sari Azoutyoutube.com
- DeepMind Researcher: AI's Makers Think It Could End Humanityyoutube.com
- AI companies will fail. We can salvage something from the wreckage | AI (artificial intelligence) | The Guardiantheguardian.com