Why did the Washington Post ban a sexual assault survivor from reporting on rape? | Washington Post | The Guardian

The newspaper wouldn’t let Felicia Sonmez cover stories about sexual misconduct. That policy was to the Post’s detriment

‘The Post’s decision to interpret a reporter’s personal history as necessitating an artificial limit to her professional opportunities echoes several broader questions facing national news organizations.’ Photograph: Pablo Martínez Monsiváis/AP View image in fullscreen ‘The Post’s decision to interpret a reporter’s personal history as necessitating an artificial limit to her professional opportunities echoes several broader questions facing national news organizations.’ Photograph: Pablo Martínez Monsiváis/AP Opinion Washington Post This article is more than 5 years old Why did the Washington

saved by

• Marilín Gonzalo

related reading

• Consent: It’s Not Sexy – The New Inquirythenewinquiry.com
• The PMC Has Sex | Virtue Hoarders | Manifold@UMinnPressmanifold.umn.edu
• Laurels and Darts: Documenting as protection.cjr.org
• Still Aliveastralcodexten.substack.com
• Rolling Stone’s investigation: ‘A failure that was avoidable’ - Columbia Journalism Reviewcjr.org
• How to write a sex column without writing about sexdailycal.org
• Figueroa Street and the Ethical Duty of Care - Columbia Journalism Reviewcjr.org
• Bari Weissen.wikipedia.org
• The Story Behind the New York Times October 7 Exposétheintercept.com
• 「エモい記事」に未来はあるか｜西田亮介＋大澤聡＋東浩紀webgenron.com
• Rolling Stone and the Temptations of Narrative Journalism | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
• The Sexual Victimization of College Womenojp.gov