The lethal trifecta for AI agents: private data, untrusted content, and external communication

If you are a user of LLM systems that use tools (you can call them “AI agents” if you like) it is critically important that you understand the risk of …

The lethal trifecta for AI agents: private data, untrusted content, and external communication Simon Willison’s Weblog Subscribe Sponsored by: Microsoft - Agent projects stall between demo and production. Microsoft's MVP checklist closes that gap. Try it The lethal trifecta for AI agents: private data, untrusted content, and external communication 16th June 2025 If you are a user of LLM systems that use tools (you can call them “AI agents” if you like) it is critically important that you understand the risk of combining tools with the following three characteristics. Failing to understand this

saved by

• Anson Yu
• Elizabeth Qiu
• Grace Nguyen
• Lawrence H
• Yudhister Joel Kumar

related reading

• The Dual LLM pattern for building AI assistants that can resist prompt injectionsimonwillison.net
• Self-Fulfilling Misalignment Data Might Be Poisoning Our AI Modelsturntrout.com
• Guardian Angels: LLM Personalization for Productivity and Security · Gwern.netgwern.net
• The End-State Fallacy: Where Is AI Security Headed?endstatefallacy.com
• Self-exfiltration is a key dangerous capabilityaligned.substack.com
• CaMeL offers a promising new direction for mitigating prompt injection attackssimonwillison.net
• Agentic misalignment: How LLMs could be insider threats \ Anthropicanthropic.com
• A basic systems architecture for AI agents that do autonomous research — LessWronglesswrong.com
• [2608.09867] Stealing Reasoning Traces from Proprietary LLM APIsarxiv.org
• My self-sovereign / local / private / secure LLM setup, April 2026vitalik.eth.limo
• Building Trustworthy AI Agents - Schneier on Securityschneier.com
• Lessons from Moltbook and OpenClaw: The Agentic Internet’s Trust Problem - Irregularirregular.com