Empirical Generalizability | Someone To Talk To | Oxford Academic

academic-oup-com.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu · 159 words · saved by 1 readers

This chapter presents each of the book’s core empirical propositions about how much graduate students change, retain, develop, avoid, and make use of confidants and compares them with nationally representative data. Drawing on original surveys and recent findings from other national studies, it examines whether other populations make decisions about whom to talk to as the graduate students did. Among the most significant findings: the core discussion networks of people at all ages change most often as they experience transitions that alter those with whom they interact on a regular basis; people actually confide often in individuals they are not close to; people often avoid those they are close to; people are willing to forgo closeness for empathy; people will often confide in whomever is around. In general, while graduate students are unique, their decisions with respect to confiding in others are largely not. Graduate students are unique. The average first-year PhD student is more ed

It looks like the link you followed uses EZproxy and is no longer valid. Harvard Library has migrated its authentication from EZproxy to OpenAthens. This change allows for more modern identity management and makes our resources more secure. Accessing Online Resources To find your resource, please: Use the EZproxy link transformer tool to update your bookmarked link(s) containing ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/login?url= to OpenAthens-compatible links, or Search for the resource in HOLLIS. Note that certain browser extensions, such as Zotero or Lean Library, may automatically add this proxy…

Empirical Generalizability | Someone To Talk To | Oxford Academic

related reading