The Risk of Discovery
paulgraham.com · 223 words · saved by 1 readers
The Risk of Discovery --> January 2017 Because biographies of famous scientists tend to edit out their mistakes, we underestimate the degree of risk they were willing to take. And because anything a famous scientist did that wasn't a mistake has probably now become the conventional wisdom, those choices don't seem risky either. Biographies of Newton, for example, understandably focus more on physics than alchemy or theology. The impression we get is that his unerring judgment led him straight to truths no one else had noticed. How to explain all the time he spent on alchemy and theology? Well,
related reading
- The Risk of Discoverypaulgraham.com
- Developing creative identitymichaelnotebook.com
- A Vision of Metasciencescienceplusplus.org
- Eureka! On the clustering of geniuses - by Rohit Krishnanstrangeloopcanon.com
- Letters to a Young Scientistshuby.de
- Is Science Stagnant? - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- A Vision of Metasciencescienceplusplus.org
- The mystery of the miracle yeardwarkeshpatel.com
- When do ideas get easier to find?freaktakes.substack.com
- Rule Thinkers In, Not Out — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Lessons from the 100 most influential scientists in history | Kasra's Blogkasra.io
- Nintil - Book review: Scientific Freedom, the elixir of civilizationnintil.com