Why products should be “slick”, not just viable | ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ Herman's blog
I hate the term MVP. Over the past decade, it’s been overused and misunderstood to the point where something labeled as an MVP is automatically assumed to be pr
Why products should be “slick”, not just viable – Herman's blog Why products should be “slick”, not just viable 02 Nov, 2020 I hate the term MVP. Over the past decade, it’s been overused and misunderstood to the point where something labeled as an MVP is automatically assumed to be pretty shit. Most MVPs are unfortunately too M to be V, and the culture of “ship it while you’re embarrassed by it” tends to lead to products providing users with an embarrassingly bad experience. The problem is that your users hate MVPs. Building products is a difficult and time-consuming effort. Figuring out what
related reading
- Making sense of MVP (Minimum Viable Product) - and why I prefer Earliest Testable/Usable/Lovable - Crisp's Blogblog.crisp.se
- Rethinking the startup MVP: Building a competitive product | Linearlinear.app
- We Don’t Sell Saddles Here. The memo below was sent to the team at… | by Stewart Butterfield | Mediummedium.com
- How to plan an MVP : YC Startup Library | Y Combinatorycombinator.com
- Excuse me, is there a problem?longform.asmartbear.com
- Guide to product development : YC Startup Library | Y Combinatorycombinator.com
- Rethinking the startup MVP: Building a competitive product | Linearlinear.app
- How To Validate Product Ideas Before (And After) Building Themtraining.kalzumeus.com
- How to build great products | defmacrodefmacro.org
- See your Career as a Producteriktorenberg.substack.com
- A guide for finding product-market fit in B2Blennysnewsletter.com
- A Smart Bearlongform.asmartbear.com