Privacy and pluralism - by saffron - Under the Rose
undertherose.substack.com · 2,521 words · saved by 1 readers
Wrangling a chameleon
I’ve always believed that privacy is a boring thing to think about. Now, I just think that most discussions about privacy involved such vague and ill-defined notions that they become unproductive, and hence uninteresting. And for good reason — privacy, I’ve found, is a difficult conceptual knot to untangle, involving unusual but not illogical ways of reasoning. Approached abstractly, the question Why does privacy matter? gives me nothing. I can’t say why, other than coming up with the uncertain, vague, and also very abstract notions of autonomy and freedom. But it has become apparent that…
related reading
- Why I Am a Pluralist - RadicalxChangeradicalxchange.org
- A Cypherpunk's Manifestoactivism.net
- Plurality philosophy in an incredibly oversized nutshellvitalik.eth.limo
- Privacy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- cryptography and social valuesjanabel.substack.com
- What Is Privacy For? | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Why not differential privacy? - Ted is writing thingsdesfontain.es
- Motivating The Case for Decentralized Social Identity: Part One - RadicalxChangeradicalxchange.org
- Rediscovering the Pleasures of Pluralism: The Potential of Digitally Mediated Civic Participation - Digitalist Papersdigitalistpapers.com
- Security without Dystopia: Structured Transparencyaiprospects.substack.com
- Big data may not know your name, but it knows everything elsenews.ycombinator.com
- MY PHONE IS FOR ME, BUT IT IS ALSO FOR YOUchiasm.substack.com