Privacy and pluralism - by saffron - Under the Rose
undertherose.substack.com · 2,521 words · saved by 1 readers
Wrangling a chameleon
I’ve always believed that privacy is a boring thing to think about. Now, I just think that most discussions about privacy involved such vague and ill-defined notions that they become unproductive, and hence uninteresting. And for good reason — privacy, I’ve found, is a difficult conceptual knot to untangle, involving unusual but not illogical ways of reasoning. Approached abstractly, the question Why does privacy matter? gives me nothing. I can’t say why, other than coming up with the uncertain, vague, and also very abstract notions of autonomy and freedom. But it has become apparent that…
related reading
- Privacy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- A Cypherpunk's Manifestoactivism.net
- What Is Privacy For? | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Virginia Woolf’s Idea of Privacy | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- seeking clarityava.substack.com
- cdn.nakamotoinstitute.org/docs/cypherpunk-manifesto.txtcdn.nakamotoinstitute.org
- Reimagining Privacy Online Through A Spectrum of Intimacy | Are.na Editorialare.na
- Decoupling vs Contextualizing Norms — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Beware Isolated Demands For Rigorslatestarcodex.com
- The Extended Internet Universe - by Venkatesh Raocontraptions.venkateshrao.com
- Unscale the internetystrickler.com
- Privacy and Information Technology (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu