Crash Course on Probabilistically Checkable Proofs (PCP)... - YouTube
3Blue1Brown breaks down the proof of Bayes' theorem by analyzing how the word "and" functions in probability. This explanation contrasts mathematical independence with correlation, addressing common misconceptions found in introductory examples. Follow along using the transcript. Follow along using the transcript.
Dana Moshkovitz, University of Texas at Austin https://simons.berkeley.edu/talks/tbd-161 Probability, Geometry, and Computation in High Dimensions Boot Camp So welcome everyone to the second lecture in our series on PCP theorems. So today we're very happy to have Dana Moskovitz from the University of Texas at Austin, an expert on PCP theorems and their applications, to tell us how to prove a weak version of the PCP theorem. Hey, thank you so much, Joe. Okay, so I would show a proof of a weak PCP theorem a proof that will hopefully more or less fit in one hour. Um, I'll try to do it the, the…
saved by
related reading
- dec9.pdfpeople.seas.harvard.edu
- PCP theorem - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Visual Information Theory -- colah's blogcolah.github.io
- Lecture 14: Zero knowledge proofsboazbarak.org
- 275A, Notes 0: Foundations of probability theory | What's newterrytao.wordpress.com
- probmethod_notes.pdfyufeizhao.com
- Definability of Truth in Probabilistic Logic - Christiano 2013intelligence.org
- ProofsArgsAndZK.pdfpeople.cs.georgetown.edu
- P vs NP and its application to zero knowledge proofs | RareSkillsrareskills.io
- SOS seminar lecture 1youtube.com
- A Succinct Story of Zero Knowledgenibnalin.me
- Intro to Proofs for the Morbidly Curiousweb.evanchen.cc