2021 AI Alignment Literature Review and Charity Comparison - EA Forum
forum.effectivealtruism.org · 62 words · saved by 1 readers
INTRODUCTION As in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 I have attempted to review the research that has been produced by various organisations working on AI safety, to help potential donors gain a better…
Misha_Yagudin 4y 33 0 0 I am confused about the relevance of Ought's work to AI alignment. They got early solid endorsements for testing Christiano's ideas around factored cognition but since pivoted to work on Elicit, which seems really cool but doesn't feel very alignment related to me. I would appreciate someone making a case clarifying the relevance/importance of their work. Reply
related reading
- Doing EA Better — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Alignment remains a hard, unsolved problem — LessWronglesswrong.com
- “Alignment Engineering” vs. “Misalignment Science”lesswrong.com
- AGI Ruin: A List of Lethalities — LessWronglesswrong.com
- 2020 AI Alignment Literature Review and Charity Comparison — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- EA and the current funding situation — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- My personal cruxes for working on AI safety — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Thoughts on the impact of RLHF research — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- AGI safety career advice — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Thoughts on the impact of RLHF research — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Defining alignment research — LessWronglesswrong.com
- EA Safetycontraptions.venkateshrao.com