Selection Rather Than Prediction – Voratiq
voratiq.com · 797 words · saved by 1 readers
Coding agents are getting quite good, and the question everyone asks is: which one should I use?
Selection Rather than Prediction – Voratiq Selection Rather than Prediction Feb 3, 2026 Coding agents are getting quite good, and the question everyone asks is: which one should I use? However, agent performance varies considerably by language, task type, and time. When you commit to a single agent, you're predicting it will be best for whatever task you throw at it. That bet might be informed by evals, experience, or word of mouth. But the variance is high enough that you'll often be wrong. Selection sidesteps the prediction problem. Generate many candidate implementations, and choose from th
saved by
related reading
- Scaling long-running autonomous coding · Cursorcursor.com
- Benchmarking Coding Agents on Databricks’ Multi-Million Line Codebasedatabricks.com
- Building Effective AI Agents \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Demystifying evals for AI agents \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Code was our medium for thoughtwattenberger.com
- Shipping at Inference-Speed | Peter Steinbergersteipete.me
- Building Effective AI Agents \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- claude code is not making your product betterethanding.substack.com
- Towards self-driving codebases · Cursorcursor.com
- How AI assistance impacts the formation of coding skills \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Training an Agentic Router for Optimal Cost-Performance on SWE Tasks | Applied Computeappliedcompute.com
- Thoughts on slowing the fuck downmariozechner.at