In Defense of AI Writing
every.to · 1,554 words · saved by 1 readers
Plus: We unpack LLM watermarks, a Codex editing workflow, and the week’s AI news
Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up to get it in your inbox. Counterpoint Writing isn’t the only way to think One of the most popular articles head of tech consulting Mike Taylor has published on Every was ghostwritten by AI, as were most of the posts on his personal blog; he revises sections and makes structural edits, but he doesn’t generate the majority of the text himself. This is the kind of admission that makes the internet foam at the mouth. People really hate AI writing. The most common objection is simple: Writing is thinking. If you outsource the drafting process to…
saved by
related reading
- If you let AI do your writing, I will come to your house and kill yousamkriss.substack.com
- Don't Let LLMs Write For You — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Why You Should Almost Never Use AI to Write Anything Substantiveerichgrunewald.com
- Writing for LLMs So They Listen · Gwern.netgwern.net
- Wikipedia:Signs of AI writing - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Human Routers of Machine Wordsborretti.me
- The Mark of the Machinenewyorker.com
- 32 notes on AI & writingjasmi.news
- The Human Skill That Eludes AI - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- should we use AI to write?velvetnoise.substack.com
- Why LLMs Are Bad Writers But Good Editors - by Jasmine Sunjasmi.news
- How Claude's text watermarking worksanthropic.com